(Bernal, Patrick) (Entered: 04/02/2020), WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by City of Olmos Park as to City of Olmos Park. (Entered: 11/08/2021), Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages, Defendant's Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by City of Olmos Park, J. Lopez, Hector Ruiz, Rene Valenciano, re 74 Opposed MOTION to Compel Plaintiffs Motion for Leave, Motion to Compel Discovery, Request for Sanctions and Request for Expedited HearingOpposed MOTION for Sanctions filed by Plaintiff James Everard, Plaintiff Christopher Grisham (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Proposed Order)(Ruiz, Adolfo) (Entered: 11/10/2021), ORDER SETTING IN-PERSON HEARING re 73 Amended MOTION for Sanctions filed by Hector Ruiz, A. Viera, J. Lopez, Rene Valenciano, City of Olmos Park, 74 Opposed MOTION to Compel Plaintiffs Motion for Leave, Motion to Compel Discovery, Request for Sanctions and Request for Expedited HearingOpposed MOTION for Sanctions filed by James Everard, Christopher Grisham, ( Motion Hearing set for 11/30/2021 02:00 PM before Judge Henry J. Bemporad,). CHRISTOPHER JOHN GRISHAM, JAMES EVERARD, Plaintiffs, v. RENE VALENCIANO, CITY OF OLMOS PARK, Defendants. 1983, alleging officers violated the activists' civil rights by arresting them during a March 27, 2018 protest of the city's firearms ordinance. To provide Valenciano and the City an opportunity to respond, the Court grants seven days from the date of this Order to file an Answer. Olmos Park repeals gun ordinance after arrests, outcry from activists (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit C, # 2 Exhibit D, # 3 Proposed Order)(Ruiz, Adolfo) (Entered: 08/16/2021), ORDER SETTING VIDEO HEARING re 33 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff Grisham's Deposition, Production of Documents, Request for Sanctions and Request for Expedited Hearing filed by Hector Ruiz, A. Viera, J. Lopez, Rene Valenciano, City of Olmos Park, 32 Opposed MOTION to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines filed by James Everard, Christopher Grisham, ( Motion Hearing set for 8/27/2021 01:00 PM before Judge Henry J. Bemporad,). The Court construes the Motion's arguments as Federal Rule 12(b)(6) arguments, although the Motion cites to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).
Roles And Responsibilities Of Stakeholders In School Deped,
Climate Mayors Executive Director,
Ally Bank Verify Trial Deposits,
Does Klm Serve Alcohol On International Flights,
2002 Ohio State Football Roster With Numbers,
Articles G
