Reset Selection Mark for Review What's This? Districts shall not be drawn to deny racial or language minorities the equal opportunity to participate in the political process and elect representatives of their choice. Gerrymandering's Effects on Democracy - UAB Institute for Human Rights Blog On September 29, 2011, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas "halted the [state House and congressional maps'] implementation and announced its intent to draw its own interim plan if the state did not obtain federal preclearance before the December 2011 opening of the candidate filing period." Moreover, as demonstrated by the results of the 2012 and 2014 elections, among other evidence, we conclude that Act 43 has had its intended effect. If political motivation is improper, then the task of redistricting should be constitutionally assigned to some other body, a change in law we lack any authority to effect. The court prohibited the state from using the map in future congressional elections. The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Goosby v. Osser that a single-judge panel will suffice if the claim presented to the court is considered to be "insubstantial. [101][102], On February 1, 2019, the court rejected a proposed settlement in which maps for some state House districts would be redrawn in advance of the 2020 election. At the time of redistricting, Democrats controlled both chambers of the state legislature, but a Republican held the governorship. Associate Justice Elena Kagan penned a dissent, joined by Associate Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor. On March 24, 2017, state attorneys petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse the district court's ruling. [209][47], Following the 2010 United States Census, South Carolina gained a congressional seat. That summer, opponents of the new legislative and congressional maps filed suit in federal court through Baldus v. Brennan, alleging "partisan and racial gerrymandering and violation of the Voting Rights Act and various state constitutional criteria." Now all Michiganders can help by engaging with the Commission, participating in its meetings, telling the commissioners about your community and how you would like it to fit within the district maps for the State. On January 31, 2018, attorneys for Pennsylvania State Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati (R) submitted a letter to the court indicating that Scarnati would not furnish the court with the requested data: "In light of the unconstitutionality of the Court's Orders and the Court's plain intent to usurp the General Assembly's constitutionally delegated role of drafting Pennsylvania's congressional districting plan, Senator Scarnati will not be turning over any data identified in the Court's Orders."
Whataburger Employee Of The Month,
Puyallup Police Breaking News,
Can Cbt Cure Gender Dysphoria,
Articles R
